both =0 is not an error#392
Merged
Merged
Conversation
mvertens
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
If both lranki and lranko are 0 this is not an error.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: mvertens
CMEPS Issues Fixes #390
Are changes expected to change answers? bfb
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Testing performed
Please describe the tests along with the target model and machine(s)
If possible, please also added hashes that were used in the testing
Problem was found when running PFS.ne30pg3_t232.BLT1850_v0c.derecho_intel at high task counts (5888 tasks)